Rankings · Scenario

Pilot fixture long-term survival

Synthetic configuration exercising the approved long-term strategy.

How this scenario is judged

This ranking is calculated from the current published Scenario configuration. Scenario Scores are derived totals and are not /10 scores.

Sustainability contributes its authored /10 score × 0.55.
Overall contributes its authored /10 score × 0.3.
Isolation contributes its authored /10 score × 0.2.
When Isolation falls below 3/10, the shortfall is subtracted × 0.8.

Showing 25 ranked Bases; the published Scenario limit is 25.

Rank 19.25 — Scenario Score
Antarctica · Polar/Arctic
Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station
Institutional Compound
Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station is strongest on Isolation 10/10 — At the geographic South Pole on the high Antarctic plateau, the station has exceptional real-world separation from ordinary population sources, with access dependent on specialist long-distance aviation or overland logistics. This fits the highest credible geographic-separation class.. Its clearest scored constraint is Maintenance Resilience 2/10 — Survival depends on highly engineered heat, power, water and sewage systems in a lethal climate. Rodwell pumping/treatment, generator/fuel systems and specialist repair cycles create several critical dependencies with limited low-tech fallback..
Overall
7.7/10
Defensibility
4/10
Isolation
10/10
Sustainability
9/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 9/10, Overall 7.666666666666667/10 and Isolation 10/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 28.2 — Scenario Score
Antarctica · Polar/Arctic
McMurdo Station
Fortified Structure
McMurdo Station is strongest on Isolation 9/10 — McMurdo is an exceptionally remote Antarctic station separated from major population sources by continental-scale distance and difficult air/sea logistics. Its large seasonal population and established transport links keep it below the rarest 10-class separation.. Its clearest scored constraint is Defensibility 3/10 — McMurdo has many secureable substantial buildings and some local terrain advantage, but the documented Base is a dispersed roughly 49-acre road-and-building campus with no continuous hardened perimeter. Twenty survivors could fortify selected buildings but could not treat the entire operating station as a strong defended compound. Antarctic remoteness is deliberately excluded from this score..
Overall
6.7/10
Defensibility
3/10
Isolation
9/10
Sustainability
8/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 8/10, Overall 6.666666666666667/10 and Isolation 9/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 38.1 — Scenario Score
Germany · Western Europe
Heligoland
Isolated Landmass
Heligoland is strongest on Isolation 9/10 — Roughly 70 km of North Sea separate the island from mainland population sources and normal access is by ferry/ship. A year-round ferry, working harbour and established resident/tourist population prevent the absolute highest separation class.. Its clearest scored constraint is Defensibility 2/10 — The canonical Base is an inhabited whole island, not one harbour or bunker. Individual buildings and cliff sectors are secureable, but twenty people cannot defend the complete coastline, harbour and settlement as a continuous hardened perimeter. Sea separation is credited principally in Isolation/Exposure rather than double-counted as fortification..
Overall
6.3/10
Defensibility
2/10
Isolation
9/10
Sustainability
8/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 8/10, Overall 6.333333333333333/10 and Isolation 9/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 47.8 — Scenario Score
Malaysia · Southeast Asia
Danum Valley Field Centre
Institutional Compound
Overall
6/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 8/10, Overall 6/10 and Isolation 8/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 57.7 — Scenario Score
Peru · South America
Tambopata Research Center
Institutional Compound
Overall
5.7/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 8/10, Overall 5.666666666666667/10 and Isolation 8/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 67.55 — Scenario Score
Cuba · North America
Guantanamo Bay
Institutional Compound
Overall
6/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 9/10, Overall 6/10 and Isolation 4/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 77.5 — Scenario Score
Australia · Oceania
Coober Pedy Underground Settlement
Remote Settlement
Overall
5.7/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 8/10, Overall 5.666666666666667/10 and Isolation 7/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 87.5 — Scenario Score
Egypt · Middle East
Siwa Oasis
Remote Settlement
Overall
5.7/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 8/10, Overall 5.666666666666667/10 and Isolation 7/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 97.35 — Scenario Score
United Kingdom · UK & Ireland
Isle of Eigg Village
Remote Settlement
Overall
6.3/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 7/10, Overall 6.333333333333333/10 and Isolation 8/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 107.3 — Scenario Score
Finland · Eastern Europe
Suomenlinna Fortress
Fortified Structure
Overall
6.3/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 8/10, Overall 6.333333333333333/10 and Isolation 5/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 117.15 — Scenario Score
Sweden · Eastern Europe
Gotland
Isolated Landmass
Overall
4.7/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 9/10, Overall 4.666666666666667/10 and Isolation 4/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 127.15 — Scenario Score
Norway · Eastern Europe
Longyearbyen
Remote Settlement
Overall
5.7/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 7/10, Overall 5.666666666666667/10 and Isolation 8/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 137.1 — Scenario Score
Faroe Islands · Eastern Europe
Faroe Islands
Isolated Landmass
Overall
5/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 8/10, Overall 5/10 and Isolation 6/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 147.1 — Scenario Score
United States · North America
Kodiak Island
Isolated Landmass
Overall
5/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 8/10, Overall 5/10 and Isolation 6/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 157.1 — Scenario Score
Norway · Polar/Arctic
Olavsvern Naval Base
Subterranean
Overall
6.3/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 8/10, Overall 6.333333333333333/10 and Isolation 4/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 167.05 — Scenario Score
Brazil · South America
Amazon Tall Tower Observatory
Institutional Compound
Overall
5.3/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 7/10, Overall 5.333333333333333/10 and Isolation 8/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 177.05 — Scenario Score
Ecuador · South America
Galápagos Islands
Isolated Landmass
Overall
5.3/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 7/10, Overall 5.333333333333333/10 and Isolation 8/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 186.9 — Scenario Score
Qatar · Middle East
Al Udeid Air Base
Institutional Compound
Overall
5.7/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 8/10, Overall 5.666666666666667/10 and Isolation 4/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 196.9 — Scenario Score
United States · North America
Telluride
Remote Settlement
Overall
5/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 8/10, Overall 5/10 and Isolation 5/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 206.85 — Scenario Score
United Kingdom · UK & Ireland
Fort George
Fortified Structure
Overall
6.7/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 7/10, Overall 6.666666666666667/10 and Isolation 5/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 216.85 — Scenario Score
Australia · Oceania
Tasmania
Isolated Landmass
Overall
4.3/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 9/10, Overall 4.333333333333333/10 and Isolation 3/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 226.75 — Scenario Score
India · South Asia
Lakshadweep
Isolated Landmass
Overall
5/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 7/10, Overall 5/10 and Isolation 7/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 236.6 — Scenario Score
Peru · South America
Huilloc Village
Remote Settlement
Overall
4.7/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 8/10, Overall 4.666666666666667/10 and Isolation 4/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 246.6 — Scenario Score
Japan · East Asia
Shirakawa-go
Remote Settlement
Overall
4.7/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 8/10, Overall 4.666666666666667/10 and Isolation 4/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.
Rank 256.55 — Scenario Score
Philippines · Southeast Asia
Batad Rice Terraces
Elevated Stronghold
Overall
5/10
Why here: Long-term score reflects Sustainability 7/10, Overall 5/10 and Isolation 6/10 under the published weighting and penalty rules.

Loading Scenario ranking…